Bringing in the Army to Break the Locomotive Drivers’ and Sailors’ Strikes in 1951
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51854/bguy-34A106Keywords:
Histadrut, labor relations, labor restraint, locomotive drivers’ strike, Mapai, military, seamen’s strike, strike breaking, unionAbstract
In the second half of 1951 the State of Israel used the army to break up two strikes: the locomotive drivers’ strike and the seamen’s strike. In contrast to the latter, the locomotive drivers’ strike has been neglected by historical memory and ignored in historical research.
Research devoted to the seamen’s strike has been carried out in isolation from other strikes during this period and presents it—mistakenly—as a unique case. As a result, it has been interpreted in the context of ideological and political confrontations, ignoring the fact that the government’s response to the strike was part of its broader approach to labor relations.
This article will claim that in view of the proximity of the strikes and the similarity of the government’s responses, the seamen’s strike should be understood in light of the locomotive drivers’ strike, an approach that suggests a different interpretation of the strike. An analysis of the two strikes in sequence reveals that in the early years of Israeli statehood, Mapai had a policy of using the army to break up strikes, which was abandoned only after it had gained experience in dealing with them.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 IYUNIM: Multidisciplinary Studies in Israeli and Modern Jewish Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Unless otherwise indicated, all articles published in IYUNIM: Multidisciplinary Studies in Israeli and Modern Jewish Society are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under the terms of this license, users may read, download, copy, distribute, reproduce, and adapt the published material for non-commercial purposes, provided that appropriate credit is given to the author(s), the journal, and the original source, and that any changes made are clearly indicated.
Copyright is held by Iyunim: Studies in Israeli and Modern Jewish Society.
Third-party materials included in an article are not covered by this license unless otherwise indicated. If your intended use is not permitted by applicable law or exceeds the permissions granted by the license, you must obtain permission directly from the copyright holder(s).
